Eritrea vs Mauritius: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share
Eritrea
100 %
in 2023
Mauritius
100 %
in 2023
Eritrea rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share over time
- Eritrea
- Mauritius
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Mauritius, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mauritius ahead.
Eritrea ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 209 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.9 % | 99.99 % | 0.0914 % | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 99.93 % | 100 % | 0.069 % | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions share, Eritrea or Mauritius?
- Eritrea, at 100 % against 100 % in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions share between Eritrea and Mauritius?
- 0 %, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Mauritius?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Mauritius rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share?
- Eritrea ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.