Kiribati vs Serbia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share
Kiribati
100 %
in 2023
Serbia
100 %
in 2023
Kiribati rank
1st
Serbia rank
1st
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share over time
- Kiribati
- Serbia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Serbia, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 1st of 209 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 % | 99.94 % | 0.0575 % | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 100 % | 99.97 % | 0.033 % | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 100 % | 99.97 % | 0.0325 % | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions share, Kiribati or Serbia?
- Kiribati, at 100 % against 100 % in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions share between Kiribati and Serbia?
- 0 %, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Serbia rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share?
- Kiribati ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 1st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.