Aruba vs Botswana: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share
Aruba
100 %
in 2023
Botswana
100 %
in 2023
Aruba rank
1st
Botswana rank
1st
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share over time
- Aruba
- Botswana
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Botswana, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 1st of 209 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100 % | 99.35 % | 0.653 % | Aruba |
| 2000s | 100 % | 99.96 % | 0.04 % | Aruba |
| 2010s | 100 % | 99.99 % | 0.006 % | Aruba |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 0.0025 % | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions share, Aruba or Botswana?
- Aruba, at 100 % against 100 % in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions share between Aruba and Botswana?
- 0 %, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Botswana?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Botswana rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share?
- Aruba ranks 1st and Botswana ranks 1st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.