Eritrea vs Sweden: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share
Eritrea
100 %
in 2023
Sweden
100 %
in 2023
Eritrea rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share over time
- Eritrea
- Sweden
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Sweden, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sweden ahead.
Eritrea ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 209 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.92 % | 99.98 % | 0.06 % | Sweden |
| 2000s | 99.95 % | 100 % | 0.048 % | Sweden |
| 2010s | 100 % | 99.96 % | 0.042 % | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions share, Eritrea or Sweden?
- Eritrea, at 100 % against 100 % in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions share between Eritrea and Sweden?
- 0 %, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Sweden rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share?
- Eritrea ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.