Aruba vs Greenland: Annual CO₂ emissions from coal
Aruba
0 tonnes
in 1985
Greenland
0 tonnes
in 1988
Aruba rank
141st
Greenland rank
141st
Annual CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Aruba
- Greenland
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Greenland, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 tonnes | 82,994 tonnes | 82,994 tonnes | Greenland |
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 107,090 tonnes | 107,090 tonnes | Greenland |
| 1970s | 0 tonnes | 25,577 tonnes | 25,577 tonnes | Greenland |
| 1980s | 0 tonnes | 3,062 tonnes | 3,062 tonnes | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from coal, Aruba or Greenland?
- Aruba, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Greenland as of 1985.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from coal between Aruba and Greenland?
- 0 tonnes, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1985.
- How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from coal?
- Aruba ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes.