Aruba vs Macao: Annual CO₂ emissions from coal

Aruba
0 tonnes
in 1985
Macao
0 tonnes
in 2016
Aruba rank
141st
Macao rank
141st

Annual CO₂ emissions from coal over time

  • Aruba
  • Macao
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k192619712016

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Macao, a difference of 0 tonnes.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 141st and Macao ranks 141st of 179 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Macao Difference Ahead
1950s 0 tonnes 9,915 tonnes 9,915 tonnes Macao
1960s 0 tonnes 13,136 tonnes 13,136 tonnes Macao
1970s 0 tonnes 5,123 tonnes 5,123 tonnes Macao
1980s 0 tonnes 5,125 tonnes 5,125 tonnes Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from coal, Aruba or Macao?
Aruba, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Macao as of 1985.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from coal between Aruba and Macao?
0 tonnes, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Macao?
31 years are reported by both, from 1954 to 1984.
How do Aruba and Macao rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from coal?
Aruba ranks 141st and Macao ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions from coal
Unit
tonnes
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
179 places, 18,115 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes.