Barbados vs Congo: Annual CO₂ emissions from coal
Barbados
0 tonnes
in 1989
Congo
0 tonnes
in 1958
Barbados rank
141st
Congo rank
141st
Annual CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Barbados
- Congo
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Congo, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Congo ahead.
Barbados ranks 141st and Congo ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from coal, Barbados or Congo?
- Barbados, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Congo as of 1989.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from coal between Barbados and Congo?
- 0 tonnes, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Congo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1958.
- How do Barbados and Congo rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from coal?
- Barbados ranks 141st and Congo ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes.