Curacao vs Ecuador: Annual CO₂ emissions from coal
Curacao
0 tonnes
in 2011
Ecuador
0 tonnes
in 1960
Curacao rank
141st
Ecuador rank
141st
Annual CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Curacao
- Ecuador
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Ecuador, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 141st and Ecuador ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 tonnes | 6,050 tonnes | 6,050 tonnes | Ecuador |
| 1930s | 0 tonnes | 988.7 tonnes | 988.7 tonnes | Ecuador |
| 1940s | 0 tonnes | 535.4 tonnes | 535.4 tonnes | Ecuador |
| 1950s | 0 tonnes | 229.5 tonnes | 229.5 tonnes | Ecuador |
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from coal, Curacao or Ecuador?
- Curacao, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Ecuador as of 2011.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from coal between Curacao and Ecuador?
- 0 tonnes, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Ecuador?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1926 to 1960.
- How do Curacao and Ecuador rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from coal?
- Curacao ranks 141st and Ecuador ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes.