Ecuador vs Greenland: Annual CO₂ emissions from coal
Ecuador
0 tonnes
in 1960
Greenland
0 tonnes
in 1988
Ecuador rank
141st
Greenland rank
141st
Annual CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Ecuador
- Greenland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Greenland, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 229.5 tonnes | 82,994 tonnes | 82,764 tonnes | Greenland |
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 120,912 tonnes | 120,912 tonnes | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from coal, Ecuador or Greenland?
- Ecuador, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Greenland as of 1960.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from coal between Ecuador and Greenland?
- 0 tonnes, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Greenland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1960.
- How do Ecuador and Greenland rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from coal?
- Ecuador ranks 141st and Greenland ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes.