Ecuador vs South Sudan: Annual CO₂ emissions from coal
Ecuador
0 tonnes
in 1960
South Sudan
0 tonnes
in 2011
Ecuador rank
141st
South Sudan rank
141st
Annual CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Ecuador
- South Sudan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in South Sudan, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 141st and South Sudan ranks 141st of 179 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 229.5 tonnes | 9,051 tonnes | 8,822 tonnes | South Sudan |
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 2,530 tonnes | 2,530 tonnes | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from coal, Ecuador or South Sudan?
- Ecuador, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in South Sudan as of 1960.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from coal between Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 0 tonnes, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1960.
- How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from coal?
- Ecuador ranks 141st and South Sudan ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes.