Ecuador vs Suriname: Annual CO₂ emissions from coal
Ecuador
0 tonnes
in 1960
Suriname
0 tonnes
in 2009
Ecuador rank
141st
Suriname rank
141st
Annual CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Ecuador
- Suriname
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Suriname, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Suriname ahead.
Ecuador ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 229.5 tonnes | 2,931 tonnes | 2,702 tonnes | Suriname |
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from coal, Ecuador or Suriname?
- Ecuador, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Suriname as of 1960.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from coal between Ecuador and Suriname?
- 0 tonnes, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Suriname?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1960.
- How do Ecuador and Suriname rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from coal?
- Ecuador ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 141st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes.