Macao vs Uganda: Annual CO₂ emissions from coal

Macao
0 tonnes
in 2016
Uganda
0 tonnes
in 2024
Macao rank
141st
Uganda rank
141st

Annual CO₂ emissions from coal over time

  • Macao
  • Uganda
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k195419892024

How they compare

Macao currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Uganda, a difference of 0 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Macao ahead.

Macao ranks 141st and Uganda ranks 141st of 179 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 7,328 tonnes 0 tonnes 7,328 tonnes Macao
2010s 523.43 tonnes 0 tonnes 523.43 tonnes Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from coal, Macao or Uganda?
Macao, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Uganda as of 2016.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from coal between Macao and Uganda?
0 tonnes, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Uganda?
8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
How do Macao and Uganda rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from coal?
Macao ranks 141st and Uganda ranks 141st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions from coal
Unit
tonnes
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
179 places, 18,115 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal, measured in tonnes.