Cuba vs Guatemala: Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled
Cuba
91,406 tonnes
in 2024
Guatemala
86,630 tonnes
in 2024
Cuba rank
74th
Guatemala rank
75th
Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Guatemala
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 91,406 tonnes against 86,630 tonnes in Guatemala, a difference of 4,776 tonnes.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Guatemala ahead.
Cuba ranks 74th and Guatemala ranks 75th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 66,468 tonnes | 62,046 tonnes | 4,422 tonnes | Cuba |
| 2020s | 77,978 tonnes | 100,390 tonnes | 22,412 tonnes | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled, Cuba or Guatemala?
- Cuba, at 91,406 tonnes against 86,630 tonnes in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled between Cuba and Guatemala?
- 4,776 tonnes, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 74th and Guatemala ranks 75th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring with 73 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.