Latvia vs Mongolia: Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled
Latvia
8 tonnes
in 2024
Mongolia
0 tonnes
in 2024
Latvia rank
104th
Mongolia rank
105th
Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled over time
- Latvia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 8 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Mongolia, a difference of 8 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 104th and Mongolia ranks 105th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.5 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 8.5 tonnes | Latvia |
| 2000s | 5.6 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 5.6 tonnes | Latvia |
| 2010s | 9.6 tonnes | 11,353 tonnes | 11,343 tonnes | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 9.4 tonnes | 32.8 tonnes | 23.4 tonnes | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled, Latvia or Mongolia?
- Latvia, at 8 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled between Latvia and Mongolia?
- 8 tonnes, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mongolia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Mongolia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled?
- Latvia ranks 104th and Mongolia ranks 105th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring with 73 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.