Montenegro vs Rwanda: Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled
Montenegro
0 tonnes
in 2024
Rwanda
0 tonnes
in 2024
Montenegro rank
105th
Rwanda rank
105th
Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled over time
- Montenegro
- Rwanda
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Rwanda, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Rwanda ahead.
Montenegro ranks 105th and Rwanda ranks 105th of 215 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1980s | 3,378 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 3,378 tonnes | Montenegro |
| 1990s | 646.5 tonnes | 2,198 tonnes | 1,552 tonnes | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled, Montenegro or Rwanda?
- Montenegro, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled between Montenegro and Rwanda?
- 0 tonnes, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Rwanda?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
- How do Montenegro and Rwanda rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled?
- Montenegro ranks 105th and Rwanda ranks 105th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring with 73 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.