Belarus vs Bhutan: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Belarus
-21.09 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bhutan
-17.03 % change on previous year
in 2024
Belarus rank
167th
Bhutan rank
164th
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Belarus
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports -17.03 % change on previous year against -21.09 % change on previous year in Belarus, a difference of 4.06 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 90 times across 171 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Bhutan ahead.
Belarus ranks 167th and Bhutan ranks 164th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Bhutan in 15.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 0.0307 % change on previous year | 34.62 % change on previous year | 34.59 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1860s | 0.2943 % change on previous year | 90.48 % change on previous year | 90.18 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1870s | 0.3704 % change on previous year | -12.63 % change on previous year | 13 % change on previous year | Belarus |
| 1880s | 0.189 % change on previous year | 4.4 % change on previous year | 4.22 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1890s | -0.0817 % change on previous year | 3.99 % change on previous year | 4.07 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1900s | 0.4158 % change on previous year | 6.32 % change on previous year | 5.9 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1910s | -0.8506 % change on previous year | 10.03 % change on previous year | 10.88 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1920s | 0.2893 % change on previous year | 1.59 % change on previous year | 1.3 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1930s | 0.5186 % change on previous year | 4.64 % change on previous year | 4.12 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1940s | -1.59 % change on previous year | 3.37 % change on previous year | 4.96 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1950s | -0.6163 % change on previous year | 14.16 % change on previous year | 14.78 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1960s | -4.26 % change on previous year | -0.9065 % change on previous year | 3.35 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 0.1067 % change on previous year | 0.4735 % change on previous year | 0.3668 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1980s | -1.81 % change on previous year | 0.1207 % change on previous year | 1.93 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 5.74 % change on previous year | 4.31 % change on previous year | 1.43 % change on previous year | Belarus |
| 2000s | 17.73 % change on previous year | -0.0865 % change on previous year | 17.82 % change on previous year | Belarus |
| 2010s | -13.09 % change on previous year | -3.31 % change on previous year | 9.78 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
| 2020s | -156.54 % change on previous year | 4.93 % change on previous year | 161.47 % change on previous year | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Belarus or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at -17.03 % change on previous year against -21.09 % change on previous year in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Belarus and Bhutan?
- 4.06 % change on previous year, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bhutan?
- 171 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Bhutan rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Belarus ranks 167th and Bhutan ranks 164th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.