Canada vs Laos: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Canada
-7.81 % change on previous year
in 2024
Laos
-9.15 % change on previous year
in 2024
Canada rank
152nd
Laos rank
155th
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Canada
- Laos
How they compare
Canada currently reports -7.81 % change on previous year against -9.15 % change on previous year in Laos, a difference of 1.34 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 86 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 152nd and Laos ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 7 and Laos in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 3.84 % change on previous year | -5.12 % change on previous year | 8.96 % change on previous year | Canada |
| 1860s | 3.08 % change on previous year | -1.13 % change on previous year | 4.21 % change on previous year | Canada |
| 1870s | -0.4588 % change on previous year | 9.49 % change on previous year | 9.95 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1880s | 1.42 % change on previous year | 7.14 % change on previous year | 5.73 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1890s | -1.34 % change on previous year | 1.2 % change on previous year | 2.54 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1900s | 9.71 % change on previous year | -5.92 % change on previous year | 15.63 % change on previous year | Canada |
| 1910s | 2.2 % change on previous year | 4.22 % change on previous year | 2.03 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1920s | -1.39 % change on previous year | 10.63 % change on previous year | 12.02 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1930s | -0.5455 % change on previous year | 5.21 % change on previous year | 5.75 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1940s | -1.78 % change on previous year | -2.46 % change on previous year | 0.6761 % change on previous year | Canada |
| 1950s | 6.59 % change on previous year | 19.79 % change on previous year | 13.2 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1960s | -4 % change on previous year | -11.58 % change on previous year | 7.59 % change on previous year | Canada |
| 1970s | -1.18 % change on previous year | 1.81 % change on previous year | 2.99 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1980s | -0.5751 % change on previous year | -0.3322 % change on previous year | 0.2429 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1990s | 0.0202 % change on previous year | 6.85 % change on previous year | 6.83 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 2000s | -6.38 % change on previous year | 9.33 % change on previous year | 15.71 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 2010s | 2.34 % change on previous year | -9.98 % change on previous year | 12.33 % change on previous year | Canada |
| 2020s | -0.8901 % change on previous year | -2.38 % change on previous year | 1.49 % change on previous year | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Canada or Laos?
- Canada, at -7.81 % change on previous year against -9.15 % change on previous year in Laos as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Canada and Laos?
- 1.34 % change on previous year, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Laos?
- 174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Laos rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Canada ranks 152nd and Laos ranks 155th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.