China vs Zambia: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
China
-2.33 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zambia
-2.47 % change on previous year
in 2024
China rank
123rd
Zambia rank
124th
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- China
- Zambia
How they compare
China currently reports -2.33 % change on previous year against -2.47 % change on previous year in Zambia, a difference of 0.14 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 64 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was China ahead.
China ranks 123rd and Zambia ranks 124th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, China averaged higher in 9 and Zambia in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | -3.13 % change on previous year | -3.46 % change on previous year | 0.3306 % change on previous year | China |
| 1860s | -14.19 % change on previous year | -1.02 % change on previous year | 13.17 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1870s | 2.97 % change on previous year | 0.1276 % change on previous year | 2.84 % change on previous year | China |
| 1880s | 13.08 % change on previous year | 2.75 % change on previous year | 10.33 % change on previous year | China |
| 1890s | 4.78 % change on previous year | -2.97 % change on previous year | 7.75 % change on previous year | China |
| 1900s | 4.63 % change on previous year | -4.63 % change on previous year | 9.26 % change on previous year | China |
| 1910s | 2.72 % change on previous year | -1.07 % change on previous year | 3.8 % change on previous year | China |
| 1920s | 0.2476 % change on previous year | 23.86 % change on previous year | 23.62 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1930s | 4.33 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | 2.38 % change on previous year | China |
| 1940s | 3.41 % change on previous year | 4.33 % change on previous year | 0.9132 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1950s | -2.16 % change on previous year | 3.6 % change on previous year | 5.76 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1960s | 18.67 % change on previous year | -3.58 % change on previous year | 22.24 % change on previous year | China |
| 1970s | 2.12 % change on previous year | -5.11 % change on previous year | 7.23 % change on previous year | China |
| 1980s | -3.49 % change on previous year | 7.62 % change on previous year | 11.11 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1990s | 0.8794 % change on previous year | 1.5 % change on previous year | 0.621 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 2000s | -7.7 % change on previous year | 10.74 % change on previous year | 18.44 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 2010s | -101.15 % change on previous year | -3.96 % change on previous year | 97.2 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 2020s | -6.63 % change on previous year | -3.06 % change on previous year | 3.57 % change on previous year | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, China or Zambia?
- China, at -2.33 % change on previous year against -2.47 % change on previous year in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between China and Zambia?
- 0.14 % change on previous year, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zambia?
- 174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do China and Zambia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- China ranks 123rd and Zambia ranks 124th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.