Nepal vs Samoa: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Nepal
-15 % change on previous year
in 2024
Samoa
-16.8 % change on previous year
in 2024
Nepal rank
162nd
Samoa rank
163rd
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Nepal
- Samoa
How they compare
Nepal currently reports -15 % change on previous year against -16.8 % change on previous year in Samoa, a difference of 1.8 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 41 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Samoa ahead.
Nepal ranks 162nd and Samoa ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 8 and Samoa in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | -3.49 % change on previous year | -4.41 % change on previous year | 0.9247 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 1860s | 0.5952 % change on previous year | 6.21 % change on previous year | 5.62 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 1870s | 7.04 % change on previous year | 2.88 % change on previous year | 4.16 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 1880s | -4.7 % change on previous year | 1.21 % change on previous year | 5.91 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 1890s | 1.8 % change on previous year | 1.81 % change on previous year | 0.0151 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 1900s | 11.63 % change on previous year | -82.74 % change on previous year | 94.37 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 1910s | 4.07 % change on previous year | 87.55 % change on previous year | 83.48 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 1920s | -2.25 % change on previous year | 8.21 % change on previous year | 10.46 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 1930s | -0.6857 % change on previous year | 4.62 % change on previous year | 5.3 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 1940s | 0.7432 % change on previous year | 4.1 % change on previous year | 3.36 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 1950s | 2.48 % change on previous year | 2.46 % change on previous year | 0.012 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 1960s | 12.4 % change on previous year | -0.7911 % change on previous year | 13.19 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 1970s | -1.38 % change on previous year | 6.91 % change on previous year | 8.3 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 1980s | -3.17 % change on previous year | -35.69 % change on previous year | 32.53 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 1990s | -0.9576 % change on previous year | 0.2202 % change on previous year | 1.18 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 2000s | 3.17 % change on previous year | 3.95 % change on previous year | 0.7812 % change on previous year | Samoa |
| 2010s | -3.84 % change on previous year | -38.61 % change on previous year | 34.77 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 2020s | -5.83 % change on previous year | -17.54 % change on previous year | 11.71 % change on previous year | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Nepal or Samoa?
- Nepal, at -15 % change on previous year against -16.8 % change on previous year in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Nepal and Samoa?
- 1.8 % change on previous year, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Samoa?
- 174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Samoa rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Nepal ranks 162nd and Samoa ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.