Oman vs Zambia: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Oman
-1.84 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zambia
-2.47 % change on previous year
in 2024
Oman rank
121st
Zambia rank
124th
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Oman
- Zambia
How they compare
Oman currently reports -1.84 % change on previous year against -2.47 % change on previous year in Zambia, a difference of 0.63 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 37 times across 172 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Zambia ahead.
Oman ranks 121st and Zambia ranks 124th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 8 and Zambia in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | -8.05 % change on previous year | -3.46 % change on previous year | 4.59 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1860s | -2.44 % change on previous year | -1.02 % change on previous year | 1.42 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1870s | -2.82 % change on previous year | 0.1276 % change on previous year | 2.95 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1880s | 5.05 % change on previous year | 2.75 % change on previous year | 2.29 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 1890s | -2.98 % change on previous year | -2.97 % change on previous year | 0.0187 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1900s | -3.11 % change on previous year | -4.63 % change on previous year | 1.52 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 1910s | -12.29 % change on previous year | -1.07 % change on previous year | 11.22 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1920s | -3.22 % change on previous year | 23.86 % change on previous year | 27.08 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1930s | -2.55 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | 4.5 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1940s | -2.64 % change on previous year | 4.33 % change on previous year | 6.97 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1950s | -9.96 % change on previous year | 3.6 % change on previous year | 13.56 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1960s | 16.39 % change on previous year | -3.58 % change on previous year | 19.96 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 1970s | -56.24 % change on previous year | -3.76 % change on previous year | 52.48 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1980s | 69.4 % change on previous year | 7.62 % change on previous year | 61.78 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 1990s | 65.47 % change on previous year | 1.5 % change on previous year | 63.97 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 2000s | 19.61 % change on previous year | 10.74 % change on previous year | 8.87 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 2010s | 1.02 % change on previous year | -3.58 % change on previous year | 4.6 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 2020s | 11.97 % change on previous year | -3.06 % change on previous year | 15.03 % change on previous year | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Oman or Zambia?
- Oman, at -1.84 % change on previous year against -2.47 % change on previous year in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Oman and Zambia?
- 0.63 % change on previous year, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Zambia?
- 172 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Oman and Zambia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Oman ranks 121st and Zambia ranks 124th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.