Peru vs Zambia: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Peru
-2.65 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zambia
-2.47 % change on previous year
in 2024
Peru rank
127th
Zambia rank
124th
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Peru
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports -2.47 % change on previous year against -2.65 % change on previous year in Peru, a difference of 0.18 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 71 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 127th and Zambia ranks 124th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 13 and Zambia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 1.63 % change on previous year | -3.46 % change on previous year | 5.09 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1860s | 0.0414 % change on previous year | -1.02 % change on previous year | 1.06 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1870s | 4.87 % change on previous year | 0.1276 % change on previous year | 4.74 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1880s | 7.78 % change on previous year | 2.75 % change on previous year | 5.03 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1890s | -1.34 % change on previous year | -2.97 % change on previous year | 1.63 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1900s | -3.06 % change on previous year | -4.63 % change on previous year | 1.57 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1910s | -0.6087 % change on previous year | -1.07 % change on previous year | 0.4645 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1920s | 2.58 % change on previous year | 23.86 % change on previous year | 21.28 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1930s | 5.12 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | 3.17 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1940s | -7.15 % change on previous year | 4.33 % change on previous year | 11.48 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1950s | 14.1 % change on previous year | 3.6 % change on previous year | 10.5 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1960s | 2.27 % change on previous year | -3.58 % change on previous year | 5.85 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1970s | 8.7 % change on previous year | -5.11 % change on previous year | 13.81 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 1980s | -2.74 % change on previous year | 7.62 % change on previous year | 10.36 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1990s | 4.32 % change on previous year | 1.5 % change on previous year | 2.82 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 2000s | 2.55 % change on previous year | 10.74 % change on previous year | 8.19 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 2010s | -0.472 % change on previous year | -3.96 % change on previous year | 3.48 % change on previous year | Peru |
| 2020s | -7.14 % change on previous year | -3.06 % change on previous year | 4.08 % change on previous year | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Peru or Zambia?
- Zambia, at -2.47 % change on previous year against -2.65 % change on previous year in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Peru and Zambia?
- 0.18 % change on previous year, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zambia?
- 174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Peru and Zambia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Peru ranks 127th and Zambia ranks 124th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.