Aruba vs New Caledonia: Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring
Aruba
0 tonnes
in 2024
New Caledonia
0 tonnes
in 2024
Aruba rank
105th
New Caledonia rank
105th
Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring over time
- Aruba
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 31 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 105th and New Caledonia ranks 105th of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from flaring, Aruba or New Caledonia?
- Aruba, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from flaring between Aruba and New Caledonia?
- 0 tonnes, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and New Caledonia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and New Caledonia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from flaring?
- Aruba ranks 105th and New Caledonia ranks 105th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from flaring, measured in tonnes.