Belarus vs Malawi: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters)

Belarus
1.41 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Malawi
1.36 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Belarus rank
103rd
Malawi rank
104th

Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters) over time

  • Belarus
  • Malawi
00.511.52199420082022

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 1.41 billion cubic meters against 1.36 billion cubic meters in Malawi, a difference of 0.05 billion cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 104th of 181 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 1.92 billion cubic meters 1.09 billion cubic meters 0.8367 billion cubic meters Belarus
2000s 1.71 billion cubic meters 1.33 billion cubic meters 0.3797 billion cubic meters Belarus
2010s 1.47 billion cubic meters 1.36 billion cubic meters 0.1174 billion cubic meters Belarus
2020s 1.39 billion cubic meters 1.36 billion cubic meters 0.0322 billion cubic meters Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, total, Belarus or Malawi?
Belarus, at 1.41 billion cubic meters against 1.36 billion cubic meters in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, total between Belarus and Malawi?
0.05 billion cubic meters, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malawi?
28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
How do Belarus and Malawi rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, total?
Belarus ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 104th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Malawi: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-freshwater-withdrawals-total-billion-cubic-meters/belarus/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-freshwater-withdrawals-total-billion-cubic-meters/belarus/malawi/">Belarus vs Malawi: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
227 places, 6,749 data points, 1962–2022
Last refreshed

Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for agriculture and industry are total withdrawals for irrigation and livestock production and for direct industrial use (including withdrawals for cooling thermoelectric plants). Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes.