Brazil vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Annual freshwater withdrawals, total

Brazil
67.94 billion cubic meters
in 2022
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1,082 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Brazil rank
12th
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
10th

Annual freshwater withdrawals, total over time

  • Brazil
  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
02505007501.0k198720042022

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 1,082 billion cubic meters against 67.94 billion cubic meters in Brazil, a difference of 1,014 billion cubic meters.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 15.9 times Brazil's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 12th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 10th of 181 countries.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2010s 65.8 billion cubic meters 1,102 billion cubic meters 1,036 billion cubic meters East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2020s 67.44 billion cubic meters 1,080 billion cubic meters 1,012 billion cubic meters East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, total, Brazil or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 1,082 billion cubic meters against 67.94 billion cubic meters in Brazil as of 2022.
What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, total between Brazil and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
1,014 billion cubic meters, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
How do Brazil and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, total?
Brazil ranks 12th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 10th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Annual freshwater withdrawals, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-freshwater-withdrawals-total-billion-cubic-meters/brazil/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-freshwater-withdrawals-total-billion-cubic-meters/brazil/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/">Brazil vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Annual freshwater withdrawals, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
227 places, 6,749 data points, 1962–2022
Last refreshed

Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for agriculture and industry are total withdrawals for irrigation and livestock production and for direct industrial use (including withdrawals for cooling thermoelectric plants). Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes.