Equatorial Guinea vs Malta: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0198 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Malta
0.0367 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
172nd
Malta rank
170th

Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Malta
0.010.020.030.040.05198020012022

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0367 billion cubic meters against 0.0198 billion cubic meters in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0169 billion cubic meters.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.9 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 172nd and Malta ranks 170th of 181 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Malta Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0106 billion cubic meters 0.0258 billion cubic meters 0.0153 billion cubic meters Malta
1990s 0.0143 billion cubic meters 0.0254 billion cubic meters 0.0111 billion cubic meters Malta
2000s 0.0191 billion cubic meters 0.0343 billion cubic meters 0.0152 billion cubic meters Malta
2010s 0.0198 billion cubic meters 0.0423 billion cubic meters 0.0225 billion cubic meters Malta
2020s 0.0198 billion cubic meters 0.0392 billion cubic meters 0.0194 billion cubic meters Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, total, Equatorial Guinea or Malta?
Malta, at 0.0367 billion cubic meters against 0.0198 billion cubic meters in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, total between Equatorial Guinea and Malta?
0.0169 billion cubic meters, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Malta?
36 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Malta rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, total?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 172nd and Malta ranks 170th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Malta: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-freshwater-withdrawals-total-billion-cubic-meters/equatorial-guinea/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-freshwater-withdrawals-total-billion-cubic-meters/equatorial-guinea/malta/">Equatorial Guinea vs Malta: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
227 places, 6,749 data points, 1962–2022
Last refreshed

Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for agriculture and industry are total withdrawals for irrigation and livestock production and for direct industrial use (including withdrawals for cooling thermoelectric plants). Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes.