Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Latvia: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total
Annual freshwater withdrawals, total over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.0% against 0.9% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 155th and Latvia ranks 153rd of 177 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.1% | 1.5% | 0.4% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, total, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 1.0% against 0.9% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, total between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia?
- 0.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, total?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 155th and Latvia ranks 153rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for agriculture and industry are total withdrawals for irrigation and livestock production and for direct industrial use (including withdrawals for cooling thermoelectric plants). Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes. Data are for the most recent year available for 1987-2002.