Cape Verde vs Serbia: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources)
Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources) over time
- Cape Verde
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 60.6% against 59.7% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 27th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.5% | 51.0% | 31.5% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 36.3% | 57.3% | 21.0% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 61.9% | 59.6% | 2.4% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, total, Cape Verde or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 60.6% against 59.7% in Cape Verde as of 2022.
- What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, total between Cape Verde and Serbia?
- 0.9%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Serbia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Cape Verde and Serbia rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, total?
- Cape Verde ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 27th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for agriculture and industry are total withdrawals for irrigation and livestock production and for direct industrial use (including withdrawals for cooling thermoelectric plants). Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes. Data are for the most recent year available for 1987-2002.