Cote d'Ivoire vs Sweden: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources)
Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources) over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Sweden
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 1.5% against 1.5% in Sweden, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Sweden ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 144th of 177 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.1% | 1.7% | 0.6% | Sweden |
| 1990s | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.0% | Sweden |
| 2000s | 1.9% | 1.6% | 0.4% | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 1.5% | 0.1% | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.1% | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, total, Cote d'Ivoire or Sweden?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 1.5% against 1.5% in Sweden as of 2022.
- What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, total between Cote d'Ivoire and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Sweden?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2022.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Sweden rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, total?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 144th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for agriculture and industry are total withdrawals for irrigation and livestock production and for direct industrial use (including withdrawals for cooling thermoelectric plants). Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes. Data are for the most recent year available for 1987-2002.