Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total
Annual freshwater withdrawals, total over time
- Lithuania
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1.9% against 1.9% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 132nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 134th of 177 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.7% | 0.6% | 24.1% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 15.3% | 1.1% | 14.2% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 2.9% | 1.7% | 1.2% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 1.9% | 0.4% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, total, Lithuania or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Lithuania, at 1.9% against 1.9% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, total between Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
- How do Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, total?
- Lithuania ranks 132nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 134th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for agriculture and industry are total withdrawals for irrigation and livestock production and for direct industrial use (including withdrawals for cooling thermoelectric plants). Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes. Data are for the most recent year available for 1987-2002.