Rwanda vs Tunisia: Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Rwanda
-100 % change on previous year
in 1968
Tunisia
-80.53 % change on previous year
in 2023
Rwanda rank
108th
Tunisia rank
107th
Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Rwanda
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports -80.53 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 19.47 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Tunisia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 108th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 112 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Rwanda or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at -80.53 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 19.47 % change on previous year, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1968.
- How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
- Rwanda ranks 108th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.