Sweden vs United Republic of Tanzania: Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Sweden
-40.07 % change on previous year
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
-68 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden rank
102nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
104th

Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Sweden
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-1000100200300196219922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports -40.07 % change on previous year against -68 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 27.93 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 102nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 104th of 112 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 2.73 % change on previous year -66.67 % change on previous year 69.4 % change on previous year Sweden
1970s 2.89 % change on previous year 55 % change on previous year 52.11 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1980s -1.58 % change on previous year 5.81 % change on previous year 7.39 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 1.34 % change on previous year 0.1772 % change on previous year 1.16 % change on previous year Sweden
2000s 0.0576 % change on previous year 12.96 % change on previous year 12.9 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 0.9735 % change on previous year 4.89 % change on previous year 3.92 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s -8.07 % change on previous year -28.87 % change on previous year 20.8 % change on previous year Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Sweden or United Republic of Tanzania?
Sweden, at -40.07 % change on previous year against -68 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?
27.93 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Sweden ranks 102nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 104th of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs United Republic of Tanzania: Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/sweden/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/sweden/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Sweden vs United Republic of Tanzania: Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
145 places, 7,454 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.