Belarus vs Uruguay: Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Belarus
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
22nd
Uruguay rank
24th

Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Uruguay
0000196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 24th of 90 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Belarus or Uruguay?
Belarus, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Belarus and Uruguay?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 24th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Uruguay: Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/belarus/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/belarus/uruguay/">Belarus vs Uruguay: Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
92 places, 4,711 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.