Ecuador vs Rwanda: Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kt per square kilometre
in 1969
Ecuador rank
78th
Rwanda rank
79th
Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time
- Ecuador
- Rwanda
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.9 times Rwanda's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 78th and Rwanda ranks 79th of 90 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Rwanda?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1969.
- How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for barley — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 78th and Rwanda ranks 79th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.