Latvia vs Serbia: Barley — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Serbia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Latvia rank
23rd
Serbia rank
20th
Barley — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 23rd and Serbia ranks 20th of 90 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barley — crop residues (emissions n2o), per unit of gdp, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in barley — crop residues (emissions n2o), per unit of gdp between Latvia and Serbia?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for barley — crop residues (emissions n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 23rd and Serbia ranks 20th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Barley — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Barley — Crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.