Austria vs Zimbabwe: Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Austria
0.6431 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Austria rank
40th
Zimbabwe rank
41st

Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Austria
  • Zimbabwe
-2000200400600196219922023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0.6431 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.6431 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 42 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 108 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 4.55 % change on previous year -16.67 % change on previous year 21.21 % change on previous year Austria
1970s 2.97 % change on previous year 46.39 % change on previous year 43.42 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1980s 2.61 % change on previous year 14.18 % change on previous year 11.57 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1990s -1.66 % change on previous year 60.64 % change on previous year 62.3 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s -2.22 % change on previous year 28.31 % change on previous year 30.53 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 0.3615 % change on previous year 1.87 % change on previous year 1.5 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s -1.55 % change on previous year 0.0453 % change on previous year 1.59 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher barley — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Austria or Zimbabwe?
Austria, at 0.6431 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in barley — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Austria and Zimbabwe?
0.6431 % change on previous year, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Zimbabwe?
60 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Austria and Zimbabwe rank globally for barley — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Austria ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 108 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Zimbabwe: Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/austria/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/austria/zimbabwe/">Austria vs Zimbabwe: Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,119 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.