Ecuador vs Sweden: Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Ecuador
-33.33 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden
-40.06 % change on previous year
in 2023
Ecuador rank
96th
Sweden rank
99th

Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sweden
-50050100150196219922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -33.33 % change on previous year against -40.06 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 6.73 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 34 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 96th and Sweden ranks 99th of 108 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 4.53 % change on previous year 7.21 % change on previous year 2.68 % change on previous year Sweden
1970s -10.29 % change on previous year 4.65 % change on previous year 14.94 % change on previous year Sweden
1980s 11.09 % change on previous year -1.58 % change on previous year 12.68 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s -2.84 % change on previous year 1.33 % change on previous year 4.18 % change on previous year Sweden
2000s -3.05 % change on previous year 0.0646 % change on previous year 3.12 % change on previous year Sweden
2010s 5.87 % change on previous year 0.987 % change on previous year 4.88 % change on previous year Ecuador
2020s -11.9 % change on previous year -8.11 % change on previous year 3.8 % change on previous year Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher barley — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Ecuador or Sweden?
Ecuador, at -33.33 % change on previous year against -40.06 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in barley — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Ecuador and Sweden?
6.73 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for barley — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Ecuador ranks 96th and Sweden ranks 99th of 108 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sweden: Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/sweden/">Ecuador vs Sweden: Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,119 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.