Australia and New Zealand vs Syrian Arab Republic: Barley — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.6242 kt
in 2050
Syrian Arab Republic
0.0997 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
4th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
5th

Barley — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Syrian Arab Republic
00.20.40.6196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.6242 kt against 0.0997 kt in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.5245 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 6.3 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 5th of 106 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0693 kt 0.0343 kt 0.035 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0.1619 kt 0.037 kt 0.1249 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.2095 kt 0.0709 kt 0.1386 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.27 kt 0.0806 kt 0.1894 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.3602 kt 0.0509 kt 0.3093 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.4318 kt 0.0643 kt 0.3676 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 0.6013 kt 0.0623 kt 0.5389 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 0.5455 kt 0.0805 kt 0.465 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 0.6242 kt 0.0997 kt 0.5245 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher barley — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Syrian Arab Republic?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0.6242 kt against 0.0997 kt in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2050.
What is the difference in barley — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Syrian Arab Republic?
0.5245 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Syrian Arab Republic?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for barley — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 5th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Syrian Arab Republic: Barley — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Syrian Arab Republic: Barley — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
147 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).