Guatemala vs Rwanda: Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Guatemala
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kt per square kilometre
in 1969
Guatemala rank
83rd
Rwanda rank
83rd
Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time
- Guatemala
- Rwanda
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 83rd and Rwanda ranks 83rd of 90 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barley — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Rwanda?
- Guatemala, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in barley — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1969.
- How do Guatemala and Rwanda rank globally for barley — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
- Guatemala ranks 83rd and Rwanda ranks 83rd of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.