Eritrea vs Sweden: Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Eritrea
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden
0 % change on previous year
in 1999
Eritrea rank
53rd
Sweden rank
53rd
Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Eritrea
- Sweden
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 53rd and Sweden ranks 53rd of 135 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Eritrea or Sweden?
- Eritrea, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Eritrea and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 1999.
- How do Eritrea and Sweden rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
- Eritrea ranks 53rd and Sweden ranks 53rd of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.