Latvia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Latvia
35.04 % change on previous year
in 2017
Sub-Saharan Africa
9.37 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia rank
8th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
5th

Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Latvia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
-1000100200196219922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 35.04 % change on previous year against 9.37 % change on previous year in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 25.67 % change on previous year.

That makes Latvia's figure about 3.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Latvia ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 135 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s -30 % change on previous year 2.41 % change on previous year 32.41 % change on previous year Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 6.25 % change on previous year 4.38 % change on previous year 1.87 % change on previous year Latvia
2010s 74.11 % change on previous year 4.48 % change on previous year 69.63 % change on previous year Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Latvia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Latvia, at 35.04 % change on previous year against 9.37 % change on previous year in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2017.
What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
25.67 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
21 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
How do Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Latvia ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/latvia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/latvia/sub-saharan-africa/">Latvia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 8,519 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.