Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Lithuania
6.48 % change on previous year
in 2017
Zimbabwe
6.45 % change on previous year
in 2023
Lithuania rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
34th

Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Lithuania
  • Zimbabwe
-1000100200300400196219922023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 6.48 % change on previous year against 6.45 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.03 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Lithuania ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 135 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 31.97 % change on previous year -8.9 % change on previous year 40.87 % change on previous year Lithuania
2000s 6.49 % change on previous year 37.33 % change on previous year 30.84 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 86.11 % change on previous year -5.46 % change on previous year 91.57 % change on previous year Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Lithuania or Zimbabwe?
Lithuania, at 6.48 % change on previous year against 6.45 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
0.03 % change on previous year, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
How do Lithuania and Zimbabwe rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Lithuania ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/lithuania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/lithuania/zimbabwe/">Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 8,519 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.