Russian Federation vs Sweden: Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Russian Federation
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden
0 % change on previous year
in 1999
Russian Federation rank
53rd
Sweden rank
53rd
Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Russian Federation
- Sweden
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sweden ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 53rd and Sweden ranks 53rd of 135 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Russian Federation or Sweden?
- Russian Federation, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Russian Federation and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Russian Federation and Sweden rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
- Russian Federation ranks 53rd and Sweden ranks 53rd of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.