Eswatini vs Turkmenistan: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Eswatini
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0006 kt against 0.0006 kt in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 93rd and Turkmenistan ranks 93rd of 127 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0001 kt | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0003 kt | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Eswatini or Turkmenistan?
- Eswatini, at 0.0006 kt against 0.0006 kt in Turkmenistan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Eswatini and Turkmenistan?
- 0 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Turkmenistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Turkmenistan rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Eswatini ranks 93rd and Turkmenistan ranks 93rd of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).