Czechia vs Malta: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Czechia
0 kt
in 2050
Malta
0 kt
in 2050
Czechia rank
116th
Malta rank
116th
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Czechia
- Malta
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Malta, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 116th and Malta ranks 116th of 127 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Malta |
| 2030s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2050s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Czechia or Malta?
- Czechia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Malta as of 2050.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Czechia and Malta?
- 0 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Malta?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2050.
- How do Czechia and Malta rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Czechia ranks 116th and Malta ranks 116th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).