Estonia vs Kazakhstan: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Estonia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 28 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 105th and Kazakhstan ranks 105th of 127 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0006 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0044 kt | 0.004 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2030s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2050s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Estonia or Kazakhstan?
- Estonia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kazakhstan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Estonia and Kazakhstan?
- 0 kt, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Kazakhstan?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Estonia and Kazakhstan rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Estonia ranks 105th and Kazakhstan ranks 105th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).