Latvia vs Rwanda: Beans, dry — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per capita
Latvia
0 kt per person
in 2017
Rwanda
0 kt per person
in 2023
Latvia rank
4th
Rwanda rank
6th
Beans, dry — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per capita over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 6th of 112 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per capita, Latvia or Rwanda?
- Latvia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda as of 2017.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per capita between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per capita?
- Latvia ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 6th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Beans, dry — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.