China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 1980
Singapore
-100 % change on previous year
in 1985
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
195th
Singapore rank
195th

Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Singapore
-100-50050100196219731985

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Singapore, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Singapore ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 195th and Singapore ranks 195th of 199 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 1.73 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 1.73 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s -32.47 % change on previous year 15 % change on previous year 47.47 % change on previous year Singapore
1980s -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 100 % change on previous year Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Singapore?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Singapore as of 1980.
What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore?
14 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 1980.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 195th and Singapore ranks 195th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/singapore/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
233 places, 12,771 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.