China, Hong Kong SAR vs Uganda: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 1980
Uganda
-45.72 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
195th
Uganda rank
194th

Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Uganda
-100-50050196219922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports -45.72 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 54.28 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Uganda ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 195th and Uganda ranks 194th of 199 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s -3.64 % change on previous year 10.16 % change on previous year 13.8 % change on previous year Uganda
1970s -32.47 % change on previous year 0.6283 % change on previous year 33.1 % change on previous year Uganda
1980s -100 % change on previous year -5.52 % change on previous year 94.48 % change on previous year Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Uganda?
Uganda, at -45.72 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Uganda?
54.28 % change on previous year, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Uganda?
19 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1980.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Uganda rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 195th and Uganda ranks 194th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Uganda: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/uganda/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Uganda: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
233 places, 12,771 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.