Kyrgyzstan vs North Macedonia: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC
Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.34 kt against 0.2705 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0695 kt.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th and North Macedonia ranks 25th of 40 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions (ch4) — unfccc, Kyrgyzstan or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 0.34 kt against 0.2705 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2009.
- What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions (ch4) — unfccc between Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia?
- 0.0695 kt, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2009.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions (ch4) — unfccc?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th and North Macedonia ranks 25th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CH4) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf