Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq)
Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 3,808 kt against 625.52 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 3,182 kt.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 6.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 65 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 215 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 323.9 kt | 1,350 kt | 1,026 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 358.75 kt | 1,546 kt | 1,187 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 446.83 kt | 1,717 kt | 1,270 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 385.26 kt | 2,071 kt | 1,685 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 506.12 kt | 2,604 kt | 2,098 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 503.44 kt | 3,448 kt | 2,944 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 485.19 kt | 3,898 kt | 3,413 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2030s | 615.29 kt | 3,316 kt | 2,701 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2050s | 625.52 kt | 3,808 kt | 3,183 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 3,808 kt against 625.52 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
- What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 3,182 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq)?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf